Khalilah Scott | Cybersecurity Risk Governance Specialist | May 2, 2023
My journey into the Governance, Risk and Compliance (GRC) space has been both exciting and has led to many questions that most newcomers such as myself might have. When adventuring into Third-Party Risk Management, it is important to know the difference between what a risk assessment and a penetration test (pen test) is. This includes some of the domains, findings and remediation efforts that one should look for within these reports.
Risk assessments, application pen tests, and network pen tests are three different methods used in the field of cybersecurity to identify potential vulnerabilities and assess the security of a system, application or network. While they share some similarities, there are also distinct differences between these three approaches.
A risk assessment is a comprehensive process that evaluates the security risks associated with an organization's systems, networks, applications, and data. It typically involves identifying potential threats and vulnerabilities, assessing the likelihood and impact of those risks, and recommending measures to mitigate or manage them. The purpose of a risk assessment is to provide an organization with a clear understanding of its security posture and help it make informed decisions about how to allocate resources to address vulnerabilities and mitigate risks.
In contrast, a penetration test (also known as a pen test) is a focused, simulated attack on a specific system or network. The purpose of a pen test is to identify and exploit vulnerabilities that an attacker could use to gain unauthorized access to a system or steal sensitive information. Penetration testing can be carried out in different ways, such as network penetration testing, application penetration testing, or social engineering testing.
While both risk assessments and penetration tests are essential components of a comprehensive security program, they serve different purposes and are conducted at different times in the security lifecycle. A risk assessment is typically conducted before a penetration test to identify potential vulnerabilities and prioritize areas of focus for the test. Penetration testing is conducted after security controls have been implemented to test their effectiveness and identify any remaining vulnerabilities.
Another difference between risk assessments and penetration tests is their scope. A risk assessment typically examines an organization's entire security posture, including its people, processes, and technology. In contrast, a penetration test focuses on a specific system, application or network and its scope is typically defined in advance.
In conclusion, risk assessments and penetration tests are both important tools for evaluating the security of an organization's systems and networks. A risk assessment provides a broad view of an organization's security posture and helps identify potential vulnerabilities, while a penetration test focuses on specific systems and provides a more targeted assessment of their security. Both approaches are essential for maintaining a strong security posture and protecting against cyber threats.
Knowing the difference between a risk assessment and a pen test can change how you calculate the potential and actual risks within your organization or the risks your organization is willing to accept/reject. This plays a major part in how your team makes decisions going forward and the vendors that are used.